Februar 2020 - FIM4L - lists3.daasi.de

Reasonable lenght of SP's session
by Koren, Meshna (ELS-AMS) 28 Feb '20

28 Feb '20

Dear all, I have another question which I posted on another thread earlier... >From the library's perspective, what is a reasonable time for an SP to maintain a session for a user? It would have been possible for Elsevier to maintain a session for any lenght of time - but is that desirable by the libraries? Should we confirm with the library that a user is still affiliated with it whenever a user wants to access the service (such as ScienceDirect)? Or every day? Every week? Every month? Every 6 months? Thanks, Meshna Meshna Koren Associate Product Manager Product Management - Identity and Access - Research Products Elsevier BV Radarweg 29, Amsterdam 1043 NX, The Netherlands m.koren(a)elsevier.com<mailto:m.koren@elsevier.com> Federated Access - SAML, Shibboleth, Corporate SSO, OpenAthens, Institutional Login ________________________________ Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Registration No. 33156677, Registered in The Netherlands.

6 7

Re: [Fim4l] FIM4L call 24Feb2020 notes
by Jos Westerbeke 27 Feb '20

27 Feb '20

Hi Friedel, Thank you for this. I also think it would be good to first resolve our own amendments. Here's my bet: Par1, comment 1 and 3: replace "customers of scholarly libraries" with: "authorized users of institutions for higher education and research" === rest will follow... I'll send you more after 15:00hr. Maybe you can call me then, to do it together? Or jump on https://meet.google.com/ppq-dqwn-zgo with Raoul? I'm now for one hour in a meeting. cheers, Jos | +31 640295513 On 27/02/2020, 10:10, "Friedel Grant" <Friedel.Grant(a)KB.nl<mailto:Friedel.Grant@KB.nl>> wrote: Good morning everyone – I started the process of cleaning up comments, in order to launch the consultation process. What I have just discovered is that I can’t selectively delete comments (e.g. test messages). I can either leave them all in place (which looks messy with all the tests), or delete all comments in order to start the consultation with a clean sheet. My feeling is that the best option is to start with a clean sheet. I’ve addressed the easy issues already (e.g., adding links, fixing typos). The attached spreadsheet contains the paragraphs/comments which need your input (remarks from me in red bold). Can the group discuss and agree on edits? If so, I will implement the new wording and then delete all comments for the start of the official consultation. Kind regards, Friedel Van: Jos Westerbeke [mailto:jos.westerbeke@eur.nl] Verzonden: maandag 24 februari 2020 15:37 Aan: FIM4L-WG(a)libereurope.eu Onderwerp: FIM4L call 24Feb2020 notes Hi all, Here you find some notes of the latest call. We finished the blogpost<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N1tQ51yflJJQTvevdmoYH6c9J5fsmapYOjfKNzW…> for the LIBER website to announce the Recommendations for public comments. We decided to use discuto as a platform with on top of it (when needed because of a bug) a note that you first have to login before giving comments. And the ability to download a PDF file that can be used to send back to LIBER with comments. Friedel will set this up, coming Thursday. Jos will prepare an email to send to the broader FIM4L listserv when setup is ready. The announcement would be distributed on: - LIBER website and members (Friedel) - FIM4L list (Jos) - IFLA (Jos) - Channels by Leonidas. (Greece) - Channels by Lee. (UK) - etc. etc. About the website. The idea is to have an dedicated website for FIM4L with address fim4l.org. Jos will set up a working document to describe the website and its content. Leonidas noted that HEAL-Link<https://www.heal-link.gr/en/aai-infrastructure/> is familiar with WordPress and is likely willing to host a FIM4L website. (Thanks Leonidas!) Seamless Access update: They are working on designing a new entity category for libraries, or maybe more entities. (Like R&S category<https://refeds.org/category/research-and-scholarship>) There is still a discussion going on. And a survey is send out to IT and library people about federated authentication and cooperation between IT dept. and Libraries in organizations. A presentation at IFLA is a good idea. There are valuable network opportunities. Peter G. showed interest earlier. Leonidas maybe. Jos will look for possibilities. (Proposal deadline 15 March.) Thank you all! And all the best, Jos -- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to FIM4L-WG+unsubscribe(a)libereurope.eu<mailto:FIM4L-WG+unsubscribe@libereurope.eu>. -- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to FIM4L-WG+unsubscribe(a)libereurope.eu<mailto:FIM4L-WG+unsubscribe@libereurope.eu>.

1 0

Federated access - Walk-In
by Koren, Meshna (ELS-AMS) 25 Feb '20

25 Feb '20

Dear all, Many libraries can, as part of their agreement with a publisher, provide access to subscribed publications to users that visit the premises. That's easy enough when the library has IP address access configured with the publisher. Has anyone given any thought to how that would work with federated access, where libraries don't use IP address authentication? And if yes, are there any thoughts or tips to be shared? Thanks, Meshna Meshna Koren Associate Product Manager Product Management - Identity and Access - Research Products Elsevier BV Radarweg 29, Amsterdam 1043 NX, The Netherlands m.koren(a)elsevier.com<mailto:m.koren@elsevier.com> Federated Access - SAML, Shibboleth, Corporate SSO, OpenAthens, Institutional Login ________________________________ Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Registration No. 33156677, Registered in The Netherlands.

6 5

Survey for people working in IT or library in higher education and research
by Raoul Teeuwen 10 Feb '20

10 Feb '20

Hi all. As employee of Dutch NREN SURF, i'm currenlty a member of the Seamless Access Outreach team. Seamless Access, the non-profit that is trying to improve ways students etc access publisher content (and maybe more), would like to better understand the knowledge and use of federated technology in libraries and IT at institutions. For that, they would like people from IT and libraries to fill out the a short survey. Could you help get this out to institutions in as many countries and institutions, ideally to someone/people that help get the below message not only in the hands of either IT or library, but both? Thank you. Raoul. >>>> example message you could forward to institutions in your national federation Hello. This message is relevant for people that work in institutions for higher education and research, all over the world, both people from the library department and IT department. Is that you: please read on. Not you? Please forward this message to a colleague, relevant mailing list where the intended audience meets etc Over the last couple of years, many things have changed around how students and researchers access publisher content. Access based on IP-address doesn’t suffice anymore. Seamless Access <https://seamlessaccess.org/>, a non-profit collaboration of librarians, HigherEd IT and publishers, is trying to improve current access challenges. Understanding the situation in institutions helps Seamless Access deliver the best solutions. They hope as many people from institutions around the world fill out: a) a short questionnaire for people working in a library in an institution for higher education or research: https://bostoncollege.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0Cbp6fmldW3iLFb b) a short questionnaire for people working in IT in an institution for higher education or research: https://bostoncollege.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0Vv0iXWMLZMd9VH We hope you fill out a survey right away as not to forget it, but you can send in your entry until March 27th. Thank you very much for your time and cooperation. In case you want to know where we have shared these surveys, please see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ShPEhqrUMeBbN9ggC1N0y1rMucSNtob0SDym2uJ…. Thank you for your time and cooperation, with kindest regards, Seamless Access.

2 1