- FIM4L - lists3.daasi.de

Slidedeck of what RA21 is & status
by Raoul Teeuwen 23 Apr '19

23 Apr '19

Hi all. In the RA21 outreach team, this slide deck was shared: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pa3XKfKFz1g1Koqz34hl_0sIpJWb9Csi … I thought people on this list might find that deck informative as well… Please let me know when there are any questions about the deck! Kindest regards, Raoul Teeuwen SURFnet | Productmanager Trust & Identity | Kantoren Hoog Overborch (Hoog Catharijne) | Moreelsepark 48 - 3511 EP Utrecht | tel:0887873496 | tel:+31641195989 | raoul.teeuwen(a)surfnet.nl<mailto:raoul.teeuwen@surfnet.nl> | www.surfnet.nl<http://www.surfnet.nl> | route: www.surf.nl/over-surf/contact-met-surf<https://www.surf.nl/over-surf/contact-met-surf>

3 2

Participants of FIM4L - list update
by Jos Westerbeke 19 Apr '19

19 Apr '19

Dear participants of the FIM4L initiative, The email list of FIM4L is growing. That's a good thing; we get attention from libraries, NREN's, and many supportive partners, from EU and recently the US. (As you can see in the email just send by Peter G. containing a PDF with names for the charter doc.) To keep track of all participants of FIM4L, we decided in our last call to ask every participant for a short introduction. At least your name, function and affiliation. And why you're on FIM4L would be nice too. Just because many of the list don't know everyone involved. We also want to ask you whether you're fine with publishing your institution and personal name on the http://fim4l.org website. (in development) Future participants will be asked to give a short introduction too. So, could you please give: 1. short intro 2. consent to publish your name on website (name and affiliation only) @Gerrit: thank you for your already given extensive intro! Thank you in advance! Jos

16 18

Fwd: 30 April 2019 - RA21 webinar
by Nick Roy 18 Apr '19

18 Apr '19

FYI, sorry for the cross-post. Nick Forwarded message: > From: Julia Wallace <julia(a)ra21.org> > To: announce(a)ra21.simplelists.com > Subject: 30 April 2019 - RA21 webinar > Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 20:47:02 +0100 > > Following the release of the draft NISO Recommended Practice on Improved > Access to Institutionally-Provided Information Resources arising from RA21, > you are invited to join a public RA21 webinar on April 30, 2019 at 10:00 - > 11.00 AM Eastern Time (US and Canada) /16.00 - 17.00 CEST. > > > > Ralph Youngen (ACS) co-chair RA21, Chris Shillum (Elsevier) co-chair RA21 > and Todd Carpenter, Executive Director of NISO will present and demonstrate > the RA21 solution and associated best practice recommendations, explaining > what publishers, platform providers and other service providers need to know > about implementation. > > > > Further information at: > https://www.niso.org/events/2019/04/niso-working-group-connections-live-rese > arch-access-21st-century > > > > No registration is required. > > > > To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=hixmZ6SAhNvvxLFDIsKCUKkRcP1jWWGW

1 0

Introduction: Heather Flanagan
by Heather Flanagan 16 Apr '19

16 Apr '19

Hola a todos! My name is Heather Flanagan, and I’m an independent contractor that works in the digital identity and standards space. My role is that of a coordinator, facilitator, process architect, and/or project manager - whatever the visionaries and engineers in digital identity and Internet standards development need in order to see their ideas actually happen. My clients include: RA21 <https://ra21.org/> (as Academic Pilot Coordinator, and starting on July 1, the Program Director for the beta service offering), REFEDS <https://refeds.org/> (as co-coordinator with Nicole Harris), the IETF LLC (as the RFC Series <https://www.rfc-editor.org/> Editor), IDPro <https://idpro.org/> (as the IDPro Principle Editor), Spherical Cow Group <https://sphericalcowgroup.com/> (as a project manager for a few COmanage <https://www.internet2.edu/products-services/trust-identity/comanage/> deployments). As you can imagine, several of my roles touch on the work happening here in FIM4L, but none of them are specifically paying me to engage with this group. I’m more than happy to talk about and coordinate between any of my roles and FIM4L. Right now, I expect RA21 and REFEDS will be of the most interest to this group. My academic degrees are a BA in Liberal Arts and an MLS from the University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill. I was _supposed_ to be a librarian when I grew up, but life took me in a wildly different direction. It’s nice to be engaging with librarians again! -Heather Flanagan https://www.linkedin.com/in/hlflanagan/

1 0

YOUR Name on the Web? Participants now ordered and in the proto-charter document
by Peter Gietz 16 Apr '19

16 Apr '19

Dear all, Thanks to those that already responded to the list I sent a couple of days before. I updated as I was told and put the list into the proto-charter document. I also added (where I knew it) the RA21 affiliation. I reordered the institutions alphabetically (with the exception of putting LIBER and GEANT at the top of their respective group. But I can change that as well. Only those 10 of 36 names marked with an asterisc* have consented their names to be published. That is not a lot. Please notify me asap, if you want or do not want to be listed on the web page eventually. Cheers, Peter -- Peter Gietz, CEO DAASI International GmbH Europaplatz 3 D-72072 Tübingen Germany phone: +49 7071 407109-0 fax: +49 7071 407109-9 email: peter.gietz(a)daasi.de web: www.daasi.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: Tübingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 382175 Geschäftsleitung: Peter Gietz

3 2

Re: [Fim4l] Participants of FIM4L - list update
by Jos Westerbeke 12 Apr '19

12 Apr '19

Hi all, I forgot to introduce myself;) I'm Jos Westerbeke, librarian at Erasmus University Rotterdam for 11 years already. Big part of my job is access management for e-resources. I have an IT background, and I am always more or less busy with IAM. And especially the last few years access management is growing. Alongside IP based access databases, ten years ago the library bought a database on CDROM and published it online on a Citrix server for students and researchers. That's over. But IP based access remained. And, as many other university libraries, our library prefers IP based access so far. Basically, for two reasons: User experience, and the landscape is not ready yet for SSO. (We struggled with one publisher for half a year arguing about privacy, attributes and profiles;) Publishers and libraries are not ready. RA21 sparked me to take action, end 2017. I drew attention to UKB (Consortium of NL univ. libraries) for attribute minimization. Then a LIBER presentation with Peter G. and Jiri about library IAM. And thanks to them (and Sander) we started FIM4L. And not at least, I did my best to find (university) libraries to make our voice heard for safeguarding SSO access. Again, librarians are very welcome! This FIM4L group with so much (technical) support is a great chance to get things done. Spread the word... Thank you all for joining this great effort! Have a nice weekend, Jos Jos Westerbeke Library IT Specialist / Demandmanager | Erasmus University Rotterdam, Library | Burgemeester Oudlaan 50 | 3062PA Rotterdam | jos.westerbeke(a)eur.nl<mailto:jos.westerbeke@eur.nl> | +31 640295513 From: FIM4L <fim4l-bounces(a)lists.daasi.de> on behalf of Jos Westerbeke <jos.westerbeke(a)eur.nl> Date: Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 14:16 To: "Fim4l(a)lists.daasi.de" <Fim4l(a)lists.daasi.de> Subject: [Fim4l] Participants of FIM4L - list update Dear participants of the FIM4L initiative, The email list of FIM4L is growing. That's a good thing; we get attention from libraries, NREN's, and many supportive partners, from EU and recently the US. (As you can see in the email just send by Peter G. containing a PDF with names for the charter doc.) To keep track of all participants of FIM4L, we decided in our last call to ask every participant for a short introduction. At least your name, function and affiliation. And why you're on FIM4L would be nice too. Just because many of the list don't know everyone involved. We also want to ask you whether you're fine with publishing your institution and personal name on the http://fim4l.org website. (in development) Future participants will be asked to give a short introduction too. So, could you please give: 1. short intro 2. consent to publish your name on website (name and affiliation only) @Gerrit: thank you for your already given extensive intro! Thank you in advance! Jos

1 0

Re: [Fim4l] Participants of FIM4L - list update
by Raoul Teeuwen 11 Apr '19

11 Apr '19

Hi all! I’m working at SURF/SURFnet, the Dutch NREN, as a product manager in the Trust & Identity team. In light of the GDPR, and maybe also since we have a hub-and-spoke-federation, our institutions, especially the libraries, have asked the help of SURF in the discussions with publishers to check what attributes publishers have required in the past, and to take steps to minimize that attribute set. So I would love to bring and share what we learn(ed) and see what we can further learn, especially to align with international library requirements and ideas about attribute release. If you would like to know more of me personally, you can check out http://nl.gravatar.com/raoulteeuwen 😊. I consent to (with, in…?) publication of my name and affiliation. Kindest regards, Raoul tel:+31641195989 On 11/04/2019, 14:17, "FIM4L on behalf of Jos Westerbeke" <fim4l-bounces(a)lists.daasi.de<mailto:fim4l-bounces@lists.daasi.de> on behalf of jos.westerbeke(a)eur.nl<mailto:jos.westerbeke@eur.nl>> wrote: Dear participants of the FIM4L initiative, The email list of FIM4L is growing. That's a good thing; we get attention from libraries, NREN's, and many supportive partners, from EU and recently the US. (As you can see in the email just send by Peter G. containing a PDF with names for the charter doc.) To keep track of all participants of FIM4L, we decided in our last call to ask every participant for a short introduction. At least your name, function and affiliation. And why you're on FIM4L would be nice too. Just because many of the list don't know everyone involved. We also want to ask you whether you're fine with publishing your institution and personal name on the http://fim4l.org website. (in development) Future participants will be asked to give a short introduction too. So, could you please give: 1. short intro 2. consent to publish your name on website (name and affiliation only) @Gerrit: thank you for your already given extensive intro! Thank you in advance! Jos

2 1

Participants for the Charter for publication
by Peter Gietz 11 Apr '19

11 Apr '19

Dear all, as promised at the last virtual meeting, I created an overview of all participants on this list, which will be part of the Charter that will be published soon. Please have a look at the attached document and either notify me, that you do not want to be listed as participant of this group or correct the data if needed and explicitly consent to be published I plan to put the amended list into the charter document Wednesday next week. By now the order within the 4 stakeholder groups is without rerasoning (alphabetic order of given name) I would propose to use alphabetical order of institution name. Any counter proposals? Cheers, Peter

1 0

Short introduction
by Gragert, Gerrit 11 Apr '19

11 Apr '19

Hi Folks, I just read the twitter announcement from the AARC-Project about this mailing list some days ago and I would be happy if you let me join not only the discussion but also active participation. Although I or my institution wasn't member of AARC, I'm following the project and the results quite a while now. So because I'm new here, let me introduce myself: My name is Gerrit Gragert and I'm working in the State Library Berlin. Amongst other things, my job is to provide and control access to our electronic resources. So, I became interested in federated identity and access management, because we as a library are both: identity and service provider. And when I compare our technical architecture in the house with the AARC Blueprint Architecture, I would say that a part of us is in every layer of the blueprint... But our library's view might be slightly different from other libraries i.e. at universities: although we have a lot of patrons, we do not have "associated scientist" at our institution. Most of our patrons already have an (federated) identity at their home organization, so it would break up single-sign-on if we supply them with a second identity in the federation. Therefore, I'm interested in secure and privacy-preserving ways to provide entitlements and other attributes to our services as well as third-party service-providers / end-services for those of our patrons who have an identity somewhere else. I'm looking forward to discuss these and other issues with you and maybe to find practical solutions to this, which may also affect any kind of "virtual organizations" in digital humanities or research data management and so on. Regards, Gerrit -- Gerrit Gragert, M.A. Ltg. IT-Services fuer die Digitale Bibliothek Abt. IDM 2.3 Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz Potsdamer Str. 33 10785 Berlin Tel.: +49 30 266-43 22 30 Fax: +49 30 266-33 20 01 gerrit.gragert(a)sbb.spk-berlin.de www.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de

2 2

Re: [Fim4l] Short introduction
by Raoul Teeuwen 11 Apr '19

11 Apr '19

On 08/04/2019, 15:37, "FIM4L on behalf of Gragert, Gerrit" <fim4l-bounces(a)lists.daasi.de<mailto:fim4l-bounces@lists.daasi.de> on behalf of gerrit.gragert(a)sbb.spk-berlin.de<mailto:gerrit.gragert@sbb.spk-berlin.de>> wrote: Hi Folks, Welcome Gerrit! … But our library's view might be slightly different from other libraries i.e. at universities: although we have a lot of patrons, we do not have "associated scientist" at our institution. Most of our patrons already have an (federated) identity at their home organization, so it would break up single-sign-on if we supply them with a second identity in the federation. Therefore, I'm interested in secure and privacy-preserving ways to provide entitlements and other attributes to our services as well as third-party service-providers / end-services for those of our patrons who have an identity somewhere else. I wonder whether the Attribute Aggregation feature of the Dutch SURFconext identity hub is basically addressing that kind of problem (not sure how easy that is to arrange for in non-hub-and-spoke federations). Any identity and attribute set can be augmented with more attributes via attribute providers that get looked up at the moment an authentication happens… We have some documentation at https://wiki.surfnet.nl/display/surfconextdev/Attribute+Aggregation and a case where it is used described at https://blog.surf.nl/en/ordering-and-reading-with-estudybooks-is-easy-and-s…. Kindest regards, Raoul.

4 6