Bingo.
We'd like to support this at Elsevier.
It is not to replace any existing reporting structures, it's just adding another dimension to them.
Kind regards, Meshna
-----Original Message----- From: FIM4L fim4l-bounces@lists.daasi.de On Behalf Of Peter Schober Sent: Friday, July 17, 2020 00:09 To: fim4l@lists.daasi.de Subject: Re: [Fim4l] Question about library/publisher reporting
*** External email: use caution ***
* Bernd Oberknapp bo@ub.uni-freiburg.de [2020-07-16 19:14]:
the COUNTER_SUSHI API usually is used for application to application communication, so I'm wondering why SAML should be considered for this case. Which libraries/consortia have suggested this and what is their use case?
I think the simple idea what for the IDP to send /something/ along to the SP so that the SP can produce aggregated reports based on the /somethings/ recieved by the IDP, ultimately providing the IDP with meaningful-to-the-IDP aggregated reports by the /somthings/ the sent along for different parts of their community. -peter _______________________________________________ FIM4L mailing list FIM4L@lists.daasi.de https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.daasi...
________________________________
Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Registration No. 33158992, Registered in The Netherlands.