Deal all, 

in eduGAIN LexisNexis Advance SP request optionally eduPersonScopedAffiliation and eduPersonTargetedID attributes. [1] In Austrian eduID.at it requests these two attributes as required. [2]  In French RENATER it requires eduPersonScopedAffiliation, eduPersonTargetedID, givenName, sn, mail attributes and supports Code of Conduct and Sirtfy entity categories. [3]

I am wondering whether everyone could be fine with following set of attributes along with CoCo and Sirtfy entity categories support:
eduPersonScopedAffiliation (required)
eduPersonTargetedID (optional)
givenName  (optional)
sn   (optional)
mail  (optional)

Universities/libraries may choose to release just eduPersonScopedAffiliation and be FIM4L privacy stars. It will correspond to the upcoming REFEDS Anonymous Authorisation entity category. [4] 

Universities/libraries may also choose to release eduPersonScopedAffiliation and eduPersonTargetedID for enabling personalisation capabilities. It will correspond to the upcoming REFEDS Pseudonymous Authorisation entity category. [5] 

And finally universities/libraries may also choose to release eduPersonScopedAffiliation, eduPersonTargetedID and let users decide about releasing name and e-mail address. [6]

Do you like this kind of approach?


Take care

           Jiri Pavlik, techlib.cz



1. https://met.refeds.org/met/entity/https%253A%252F%252Fsignin.lexisnexis.com%252Flnaccess%252Ffed%252Fauthn/?federation=edugain

2. https://met.refeds.org/met/entity/https%253A%252F%252Fsignin.lexisnexis.com%252Flnaccess%252Ffed%252Fauthn/?federation=aconet-identity-federation-eduidat

3. https://met.refeds.org/met/entity/https%253A%252F%252Fsignin.lexisnexis.com%252Flnaccess%252Ffed%252Fauthn/?federation=federation-education-recherche

4. https://wiki.refeds.org/display/CON/Entity+Category+Consultation+Anonymous+Authorization

5. https://wiki.refeds.org/display/CON/Entity+Category+Consultation+Pseudonymous+Authorization

6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znpjHR6LOxs