15 Mai
2019
15 Mai
'19
14:51
On 15/05/2019, 14:26, "FIM4L on behalf of Peter Schober" <fim4l-bounces@lists.daasi.de on behalf of peter.schober@univie.ac.at> wrote: I.e., I wouldn't aim for *one* category/classification/grouping of SAML SPs (what you call "SAML connection" above, AFAIU?) that should cover the two cases of "can work without recognising returning subjects" vs. "needs stable identifier", but two separate ones, clearly defined and delineated.
I think you're right. Jos