Apologies for cross-posting -
I'm working with ORCID on a study to get a better understanding of the role of things like bios, profiles, CVs, personal websites, etc as a mechanism for digital introduction for any purpose. We're also looking for insights about how researchers regard the use of this type of artifact for consequential interactions, for example, decisions about promotion, tenure, funding, data access, project involvement, etc.
Would you be able to help to get the word out to any researcher communities that you are a part of? Researchers/ scholars do not need to have any knowledge or experience with ORCID. A short blurb is below along with a link to ORCID's blog post about it.
---
ORCID (orcid.org) provides a persistent digital identifier that distinguishes you from every other researcher and, through integration in key research workflows such as manuscript and grant submission, supports automated linkages between you and your professional activities ensuring that your work is recognized. Between now and May 1, ORCID is looking for researchers and scholars from all countries, career stages, and disciplines to tell us what they think about how they are connected to their work so we can ultimately improve and enrich the environments, workflows, and interactions that are a part of research and scholarly work. There are two ways to participate - find out more:
---
Thanks!
Best, L
--
