As I wrote in one of the first emails in this thread, I wouldn't mix authorization with statistics, because the information required for the statistics might differ from the information required for the authorization. And there already exists a suggestion for a SCHAC attribute for the statistics use case (schacLocalReportingCode).
Best regards, Bernd
On 2019-04-25 10:47, Jos Westerbeke wrote:
On 24/04/2019, 17:52, peter.schober@univie.ac.at> wrote:
Also note that nothing in this thread relates to the subject topic (statistics, reporting) in the least. This is all still about authorisation.It's about authorisation, yes. But I think this also relates to giving the SP the ability to build statistics.
Peter G. wrote about the initial question from Jiri: "Should we also write a recommendation for publishers?"
I would suggest to do that. Maybe just optional. At least to make awareness of the advances of exchanging attributes like student/staff, faculty, etc. in the right (privacy preserving) way. Whether a library may use it or not. Publishers definitely would like this. Some guidance from this group would be appreciated by publishers I think.
cheers, Jos
FIM4L mailing list FIM4L@lists.daasi.de http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l