Using just the entitlement information from the publishers' websites isn't sufficient, since many full texts are licensed on other platforms, especially aggregators like EBSCO or ProQuest. So unless aggregators take part (which seems very unlikely for EBSCO and ProQuest since they have their own discovery platforms) or link resolvers are integrated, users won't have access to large parts of the licensed content via GetFTR. Google Scholar covers lots of publishers, also provides access to free versions and integrates link resolvers, so I'm wondering why users should switch from Google Scholar (or a discovery tool provided by the library) to GetFTR?
Best regards, Bernd
On 04.12.19 16:51, Lisa Hinchliffe wrote:
Riger Schonfeld has a great piece on this in SK yesterday .... https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/12/03/publishers-announce-plug-leak...
I'd love to see a demo. Its hard to conceptualize from just text!
Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe lisalibrarian@gmail.com
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 9:15 AM Jiri Pavlik jiri.pavlik@mzk.cz wrote:
Dear all,
you may like to check Get Full Text Research (GetFTR) - https://www.getfulltextresearch.com/
It seems that American Chemical Society, Elsevier, Taylor & Francis and Wiley are going to rollout Seamless access sign in button and WAYF soon. Springer Nature already implemented it at Nature.com platform.
Would you like to share comment on that, Chris? :-)
Best regards
Jiri
FIM4L mailing list FIM4L@lists.daasi.de http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l
FIM4L mailing list FIM4L@lists.daasi.de http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l