Am 30.07.19 um 11:18 schrieb Jiri Pavlik:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:03 PM Bernd Oberknapp bo@ub.uni-freiburg.de wrote:
Could be Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg a representative of a group of universitites, libraries who don't want to release any identifier and want their users to sign-in twice for personalisation? We should tune up 5a in our recommentations according to wishes of this group.
No. In my opinion the solution should be to only release a persistent identifier (as an attribute) when the user wants to use the personalization, so we will look at optionally releasing attributes in the medium/long term.
I can see there is CAR: Consent-informed Attribute Release system available for optional release of attributes - https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/display/CAR/CAR%3A+Consent-informed+Attribut...
Thanks to Tom Cramer for mentioning the system developed at Duke University.
Yes I remeber a number of Talks Ken Klingenstein gave on that. Concept-wise I think it is good stuff. There also is an integration with Shibboleth IdP done by Shilen Patel also from Duke Univerity. But to be honest, I am not familiar who except Duke is using it
Cheers,
Peter
Best regards
Jiri
FIM4L mailing list FIM4L@lists.daasi.de http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l