[Fim4l] Fwd: GetFTR

Thu Dec 5 10:37:53 CET 2019

I do see some other flaws:

  *   If I understand this well, it will only work for publications that have a doi. Unfortunately that is not the case for every e-publication, and not every discovery layer has got the doi for each publication in its meta data
  *   It only works for publishers and integrators that support federated authentication and will join the common GFTR environment. Harder to implement for small publishers
  *   It only seems to work in discovery layers that themselves support Federated authentication, since they have tp provide the user affiliation to the GFTR API’s. I do not think that Google Scholar will give up authenticating by google over authenticating by distributed Identity providers.
  *   Will it be easy to join the GFTR environment ? Not only for aggregators and small publishers but also for libraries to for example offer links to content in their repositories for example

Peter

      Drs. P.J.C. van Boheemen
     MDT Library
     FB – Information Technology
     Wageningen University & Research
     tel. +31 317 48 25 17
     FORUM, building 102
     Droevendaalseseteeg 2, 6708 PB, Wageningen
    [cid:image001.png at 01D3315D.FE77CCE0]

From: FIM4L <fim4l-bounces at lists.daasi.de> On Behalf Of Lisa Hinchliffe
Sent: donderdag 5 december 2019 12:53
To: Bernd Oberknapp <bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>
Cc: fim4l at lists.daasi.de
Subject: Re: [Fim4l] Fwd: GetFTR

As I understand it, GetFTR is not a user facing tool. A user won't have any control over whether there are GFTR links in the tool they are using any more than they control any other aspects of what an interface presents to them.  From what I read, any discovery layer (what GFTR is calling a technology integration partner) will eventually be able to turn on GFTR links using the APIs. So, beyond Dimensions, Mendeley, etc. in the early pilot, GFTR links could eventually appear in Google Scholar (if Google wanted them to), in library subscribed databases (beyond Dimensions), in A&I services, in citation management tools, on ResearchGate, etc.

The issue of aggregator content and GFTR is not whether the aggregators might turn on GFTR links (which they may) but that aggregator hosted content is currently not able to be a target for a GFTR link. So, if the library doesn't have the content from the publisher directly, the GFTR link will convey to the user that the library does not have it ... even if it does on an aggregator. Some of us suspect that while libraries will see this as a flaw in GFTR, the publishers will see this as a feature and so this "limitation" (to use Roger's term in the SK post) is likely to persist.

Lisa

___

Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
lisalibrarian at gmail.com<mailto:lisalibrarian at gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:58 PM Bernd Oberknapp <bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de<mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>> wrote:
Using just the entitlement information from the publishers' websites
isn't sufficient, since many full texts are licensed on other platforms,
especially aggregators like EBSCO or ProQuest. So unless aggregators
take part (which seems very unlikely for EBSCO and ProQuest since they
have their own discovery platforms) or link resolvers are integrated,
users won't have access to large parts of the licensed content via
GetFTR. Google Scholar covers lots of publishers, also provides access
to free versions and integrates link resolvers, so I'm wondering why
users should switch from Google Scholar (or a discovery tool provided by
the library) to GetFTR?

Best regards,
Bernd

On 04.12.19 16:51, Lisa Hinchliffe wrote:
> Riger Schonfeld has a great piece on this in SK yesterday ....
> https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/12/03/publishers-announce-plug-leakage/
>
> I'd love to see a demo. Its hard to conceptualize from just text!
>
> Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
> lisalibrarian at gmail.com<mailto:lisalibrarian at gmail.com>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 9:15 AM Jiri Pavlik <jiri.pavlik at mzk.cz<mailto:jiri.pavlik at mzk.cz>> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> you may like to check Get Full Text Research (GetFTR) -
>>      https://www.getfulltextresearch.com/
>>
>> It seems that American Chemical Society, Elsevier, Taylor & Francis and
>> Wiley
>> are going to rollout Seamless access sign in button and WAYF soon.
>> Springer Nature
>> already implemented it at Nature.com platform.
>>
>> Would you like to share comment on that, Chris? :-)
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>                       Jiri
>> _______________________________________________
>> FIM4L mailing list
>> FIM4L at lists.daasi.de<mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>
>> http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FIM4L mailing list
> FIM4L at lists.daasi.de<mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>
> http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l
>

--
Bernd Oberknapp
Gesamtleitung ReDI

Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Universitätsbibliothek
Platz der Universität 2 | Postfach 1629
D-79098 Freiburg        | D-79016 Freiburg

Telefon:  +49 761 203-3852
Telefax:  +49 761 203-3987
E-Mail:   bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de<mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>
Internet: www.ub.uni-freiburg.de<http://www.ub.uni-freiburg.de>

_______________________________________________
FIM4L mailing list
FIM4L at lists.daasi.de<mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>
http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.daasi.de/pipermail/fim4l/attachments/20191205/e036b6ad/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3815 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.daasi.de/pipermail/fim4l/attachments/20191205/e036b6ad/attachment-0001.png>