[Fim4l] Question about library/publisher reporting
Koren, Meshna (ELS-AMS)
M.Koren at elsevier.com
Mon Jul 20 12:44:00 CEST 2020
We'd like to support this at Elsevier.
It is not to replace any existing reporting structures, it's just adding another dimension to them.
From: FIM4L <fim4l-bounces at lists.daasi.de> On Behalf Of Peter Schober
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2020 00:09
To: fim4l at lists.daasi.de
Subject: Re: [Fim4l] Question about library/publisher reporting
*** External email: use caution ***
* Bernd Oberknapp <bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de> [2020-07-16 19:14]:
> the COUNTER_SUSHI API usually is used for application to application
> communication, so I'm wondering why SAML should be considered for this case.
> Which libraries/consortia have suggested this and what is their use case?
I think the simple idea what for the IDP to send /something/ along to the SP so that the SP can produce aggregated reports based on the /somethings/ recieved by the IDP, ultimately providing the IDP with meaningful-to-the-IDP aggregated reports by the /somthings/ the sent along for different parts of their community.
FIM4L mailing list
FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Registration No. 33158992, Registered in The Netherlands.
More information about the FIM4L