[Fim4l] LexisNexis Advance

Jiri Pavlik jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
Sat Mar 13 09:15:07 CET 2021


Hi Bernd,

I see, thanks a lot for the clarification.

When checking ProQuest SP for ProQuest Central in DFN-AAI metadata [1]
I can see both eduPersonEntitlement and eduPersonTargetedID as required
attributes.

Is it safe to assume that if there is personalisation capability at a
library service
then all German universities, libraries are fine with
releasing eduPersonTargetedID
for recognising returning users and eduPersonEntitlement,
eduPersonScopedAffiliation
for authorisation?

Cheers
                  Jiri


1.
https://met.refeds.org/met/entity/https%253A%252F%252Fshibboleth-sp.prod.proquest.com%252Fshibboleth/?federation=dfn-aai



On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:10 PM Bernd Oberknapp <bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>
wrote:

> Hi Jiri,
>
> I don't think so, but the configuration of ProQuest Ebook Central is
> quite complex, and I cannot exclude that some configurations don't
> require an ID (for example if downloading/lending ebooks is disabled).
>
> I ran some tests when I created our setup in 2017 because the support
> wasn't able to answer my questions about the supported attribute
> combinations. The documentation
>
> https://support.proquest.com/articledetail?id=kA23r000000FVtKCAW&key=&pcat=&icat=
> seems to be wrong, just sending eduPersonTargetedID didn't work. Maybe
> it would work with the deprecated scoped format, I haven't tried that.
> The documentation suggests that eduPersonPrincipalName or a persistent
> ID could be used instead of eduPersonTargetedID, but I haven't tried
> that either. Both eduPersonScopedAffiliation or eduPersonEntitlement
> (common-lib-terms) worked fine for authorization.
>
> Best regards,
> Bernd
>
>
> On 12.03.21 19:34, Jiri Pavlik wrote:
>  > Hi Bernd,
>  >
>  > when checking ProQuest Ebook Central SP metadata in DFN-AAI/eduGAIN [1],
>  > I can see:
>  > eduPersonScopedAffiliation (required)
>  > eduPersonTargetedID (optional)
>  >
>  > Is it correct that universities, libraries in Germany are free to choose
>  > whether release
>  >    eduPersonScopedAffiliation
>  > or
>  >    eduPersonScopedAffiliation
>  >    eduPersonTargetedID
>  > to ProQuest Ebook Central?
>  >
>  >
>  > Have a nice weekend
>  >
>  >            Jiri
>  >
>  > 1.
>  >
>
> https://met.refeds.org/met/entity/https%253A%252F%252Fsp.ebrary.com%252Fshibboleth/?federation=edugain
>  >
>  > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 6:50 PM Bernd Oberknapp <bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  > <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>> wrote:
>  >
>  >     Hi Jiri,
>  >
>  >     I'm not sure if eduPersonEntitlement is still required for the
> DFN-AAI
>  >     (in the past common-lib-terms was the default authorization rule for
>  >     IdPs in the DFN-AAI), but eduPersonTargetedID (optional) is clearly
>  >     missing.
>  >
>  >     Best regards,
>  >     Bernd
>  >
>  >
>  >     On 12.03.21 08:58, Jiri Pavlik wrote:
>  >       > Hello,
>  >       >
>  >       > we can check Elsevier Science Direct for inspiration as well.
>   Here
>  >       > eduPersonEntitlement is used for authorisation and
>  >     eduPersonTargetedID
>  >       > is used for recognising returning users and for personalisation.
>  >     So the
>  >       > right fit
>  >       > of requested attributes here could be:
>  >       > - eduPersonEntitlement (required)
>  >       > - eduPersonTargetedID (optional)
>  >       >
>  >       > If eduPersonTargetedID attribute is released according to user
>  >     consent
>  >       > then the user
>  >       > is in charge whether he/she could use personalisation or prefers
>  >       > anonymous access.
>  >       >
>  >       > This set of requested attributes in Elsevier SD metadata [1] is
>  >       > registered in  Australian Access Federation and in IDEM.
>  >       >
>  >       > There is a vast variety of other requested attributes sets
>  >     ranging from
>  >       > - eduPersonEntitlement (required)
>  >       > - eduPersonTargetedID (required)
>  >       > (eduID.at, RENATER, SWITCHaai, Edugate, LIAF)
>  >       > via
>  >       > - eduPersonEntitlement (required)
>  >       > (DFN-AAI)
>  >       > and
>  >       > - eduPersonEntitlement (optional)
>  >       > - eduPersonTargetedID (optional)
>  >       > (InCommon)
>  >       > to
>  >       > no required attributes at all.
>  >       > (eduGAIN/UK Federation, Belnet, CAFe, CARSI, CORFe, GakuNin)
>  >       >
>  >       > There are also federations where eduPersonScopedAffiliation
> is among
>  >       > required attributes and
>  >       > federations where there is eduPersonTargetedID attribute
>  >     required only.
>  >       >
>  >       >
>  >       > Take care, stay healthy
>  >       >
>  >       >            Jiri
>  >       >
>  >       >
>  >       >
>  >       > 1.
>  >       >
>  >
>
> https://met.refeds.org/met/entity/https%253A%252F%252Fsdauth.sciencedirect.com%252F/
>  >       >
>  >       >
>  >       >
>  >       > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:22 PM Jiri Pavlik
>  >     <jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>
>  >       > <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
> >>>
>  >     wrote:
>  >       >
>  >       >     Hi Bernd,
>  >       >
>  >       >     I see, thanks.
>  >       >
>  >       >     IMHO if eduPersonTargetedID is released, an institutional
>  >     account is
>  >       >     used as a personal
>  >       >     user account at EBSCOhost as well. If eduPersonTargetedID
> is not
>  >       >     released users need to sign
>  >       >     in with a Google or local account and institutional sign in
>  >     could be
>  >       >     used for authorisation [1].
>  >       >
>  >       >     That said the right fit for EBSCOhost could be:
>  >       >     - eduPersonScopedAffiliation (required)
>  >       >     - eduPersonEntitlement (required)
>  >       >     - eduPersonTargetedID (optional)
>  >       >
>  >       >     When an organisation chooses to release eduPersonTargetedID
>  >       >     attribute then users of the organization
>  >       >     can use an institutional account as a personal account at
>  >     EBSCOhost
>  >       >     as well.
>  >       >
>  >       >     If eduPersonTargetedID attribute is released according to
> user
>  >       >     consent then the user
>  >       >     is in charge whether his/her institutional account is used
> as
>  >       >     personal account at EBSCOhost or it is not.
>  >       >
>  >       >     Best
>  >       >                      Jiri
>  >       >
>  >       >
>  >       >     1.
>  >       >
>  >
>
> https://connect.ebsco.com/s/article/How-do-I-authorize-reauthorize-my-personal-user-account?language=en_US
>  >       >
>  >       >     On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 7:31 PM Bernd Oberknapp
>  >       >     <bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >     <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>>>
> wrote:
>  >       >
>  >       >         Hi Jiri,
>  >       >
>  >       >         for EBSCOhost yes, it doesn't seem to make a difference
>  >     whether I'm
>  >       >         logged in with a personal account or not, the number of
>  >     ebooks
>  >       >         available
>  >       >         for download and also the limitations seem to be the
> same.
>  >       >
>  >       >         I couldn't try if this works with the EBSCO Mobile app
>  >     because
>  >       >         the sign
>  >       >         in either fails or fails to connect to the app (for all
>  >     methods,
>  >       >         not
>  >       >         just for Shibboleth).
>  >       >
>  >       >         Best regards,
>  >       >         Bernd
>  >       >
>  >       >
>  >       >         On 11.03.21 18:46, Jiri Pavlik wrote:
>  >       >           > Hi Bernd,
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           > Is downloading of e-books at EBSCO eBooks for
> off-line
>  >       >         reading working
>  >       >           > as well
>  >       >           > when eduPersonTargetedID is not provided?
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           > BR
>  >       >           >                    Jiri
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 6:37 PM Bernd Oberknapp
>  >       >         <bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >     <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>>
>  >       >           > <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  >     <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >       >         <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  >     <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>>>> wrote:
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >     Hello,
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >     eduPersonTargetedID is not necessary for
>  >     EBSCOhost, the
>  >       >         login works
>  >       >           >     fine
>  >       >           >     with just eduPersonScopedAffiliation or
>  >       >         eduPersonEntitlement.
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >     We should not recommend to make
>  >     eduPersonTargetedID a
>  >       >         requirement or
>  >       >           >     declare it as required if it isn't necessary.
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >     Best regards,
>  >       >           >     Bernd
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >     On 11.03.21 18:32, Jiri Pavlik wrote:
>  >       >           >       > Hi,
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       > Let me point out to  EBSCOhost as a similar
>  >     service.
>  >       >         Similar
>  >       >         set of
>  >       >           >       > requested attributes:
>  >       >           >       > - eduPersonScopedAffiliation (required)
>  >       >           >       > - eduPersonTargetedID (required)
>  >       >           >       > - eduPersonEntitlement (required)
>  >       >           >       > should be the right fit here because
>  >     EBSCOhost is
>  >       >           >       > using eduPersonScopedAffiliation and
>  >       >           >       > eduPersonEntitlement values for
> authorisation,
>  >       >           >     eduPersonTargetedID for
>  >       >           >       > recognising returning user and providing
>  >       >         personalisation.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       > Looking at EBSCOhost SP metadata I can see
>  >     that in
>  >       >         Finland
>  >       >         [1] or in
>  >       >           >       > Australia [2] there is an interest in
> releasing
>  >       >         givenName,
>  >       >         sn, mail
>  >       >           >       > attributes.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       > Listing eduPersonScopedAffiliation,
>  >     eduPersonTargetedID,
>  >       >           >       > eduPersonEntitlement as optional in UK
>  >     Federation /
>  >       >         eduGAIN
>  >       >         [3] or
>  >       >           >       > listing no requested attributes at all in US
>  >     InCommon
>  >       >           >     Federations seems
>  >       >           >       > like a mistake to me.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       > All the best
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >             Jiri
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       > 1.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >
>  >       >
>  >
>
> https://met.refeds.org/met/entity/http%253A%252F%252Fshibboleth.ebscohost.com/?federation=haka
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       > 2.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >
>  >       >
>  >
>
> https://met.refeds.org/met/entity/http%253A%252F%252Fshibboleth.ebscohost.com/?federation=australian-access-federation
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       > 3.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >
>  >       >
>  >
>
> https://met.refeds.org/met/entity/http%253A%252F%252Fshibboleth.ebscohost.com/?federation=edugain
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       > 4.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >
>  >       >
>  >
>
> https://met.refeds.org/met/entity/http%253A%252F%252Fshibboleth.ebscohost.com/?federation=incommon-federation
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 3:28 PM Jiri Pavlik
>  >       >           >     <jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz> <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>>
>  >       >         <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz> <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>>>
>  >       >           >       > <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>
>  >       >         <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>> <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>
>  >       >         <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>>>>>
>  >       >           >     wrote:
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >     Hi Peter,
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >     The intent here is worldwide agreement
>  >     within
>  >       >         FIM4L actually
>  >       >           >     what is
>  >       >           >       >     the best fit for LexisNexis Advance
>  >       >           >       >     and all similar SPs out there. IMHO your
>  >       >         suggestion is:
>  >       >           >       >     - eduPersonScopedAffiliation (required)
>  >       >           >       >     - eduPersonTargetedID (required)
>  >       >           >       >     - Sirtfy support
>  >       >           >       >     And rather SAML pairwise-id than
>  >       >         eduPersonTargetedID as
>  >       >           >     described in
>  >       >           >       >     FIM4L recommendations and
>  >       >           >       >     REFEDS Pseudonymous Authorisation entity
>  >     category
>  >       >         specification.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >     I am wondering whether there is an
>  >     opportunity
>  >       >         of employing a
>  >       >           >       >     Consent-informed Attribute Release
> system
>  >     (CAR) [1]
>  >       >           >       >     for releasing name and e-mail address
>  >     with user
>  >       >         consent. I
>  >       >           >     can see
>  >       >           >       >     that French colleagues at least may be
>  >     interested
>  >       >           >       >     in that.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >     Best
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >                    Jiri
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >     1.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >
>  >       >
>  >
>
> https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/display/CAR/CAR%3A+Consent-informed+Attribute+Release+system#:~:text=initially%20designed%20to%20be%20a,Consent%2Dinformed%20Attribute%20Release.%22
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >     On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:03 PM Peter
>  >     Schober
>  >       >           >       >     <peter.schober at univie.ac.at
>  >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at>
>  >       >         <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at
>  >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at>>
>  >       >           >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at
>  >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at>
>  >       >         <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at
>  >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at>>>
>  >       >           >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at
>  >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at>
>  >       >         <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at
>  >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at>>
>  >       >           >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at
>  >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at>
>  >       >         <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at
>  >     <mailto:peter.schober at univie.ac.at>>>>>
>  >       >           >     wrote:
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >         * Jiri Pavlik
>  >     <jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>
>  >       >         <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>>
>  >       >           >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>
>  >       >         <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>>>
>  >       >           >       >         <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>
>  >       >         <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>>
>  >       >           >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>
>  >       >         <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz
>  >     <mailto:jiri.pavlik at techlib.cz>>>>> [2021-03-11 09:05]:
>  >       >           >       >          > I am wondering whether everyone
>  >     could be
>  >       >         fine with
>  >       >           >     following
>  >       >           >       >         set of
>  >       >           >       >          > attributes along with CoCo and
>  >     Sirtfy
>  >     entity
>  >       >         categories
>  >       >           >     support:
>  >       >           >       >          > eduPersonScopedAffiliation
> (required)
>  >       >           >       >          > eduPersonTargetedID (optional)
>  >       >           >       >          > givenName  (optional)
>  >       >           >       >          > sn   (optional)
>  >       >           >       >          > mail  (optional)
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >         Ignoring the fact that ultimately
>  >     existing
>  >       >         bilateral (or
>  >       >           >     consortial)
>  >       >           >       >         contracts (here with LN) will always
>  >     trump
>  >       >         what GÉANT
>  >       >           >     CoCo says,
>  >       >           >       >         note
>  >       >           >       >         that CoCo v1 (the only released
>  >     version that
>  >       >         currently
>  >       >           >     exists)
>  >       >           >       >         explicitly only covers strictly
>  >     *required*
>  >       >           >     (isRequired="true" in
>  >       >           >       >         SAML
>  >       >           >       >         Metadata) attributes. It cannot be
>  >     used for
>  >       >         optional
>  >       >         data.
>  >       >           >       >            People should also be aware that
>  >     there is
>  >       >         no clear
>  >       >           >     indication
>  >       >           >       >         that
>  >       >           >       >         LexisNexis even intended to adhere
>  >     to the
>  >       >         GÉANT CoCo
>  >       >           >     specification:
>  >       >           >       >         All that I've seen so far is
>  >     RENATER's claim
>  >       >         that the LN
>  >       >           >     SP is
>  >       >           >       >         covered
>  >       >           >       >         by CoCo. But CoCo also requires
> that the
>  >       >         Privacy Policy
>  >       >           >     for a
>  >       >           >       >         SAML SP
>  >       >           >       >         adhering to CoCo contains a
>  >     reference to the
>  >       >         GÉANT
>  >       >         CoCo and
>  >       >           >     this is
>  >       >           >       >         NOT the case with LexisNexis here
>  >     (not even
>  >       >         in the URL
>  >       >           >     referenced in
>  >       >           >       >         the RENATER metadata).
>  >       >           >       >            So the CoCo-support of the
>  >     LexisNexis SP
>  >       >         is (1) highly
>  >       >           >       >         questionable,
>  >       >           >       >         IMO, and (2) very likely
> meaningless in
>  >       >         light of actual
>  >       >           >     contracts
>  >       >           >       >         governing use of / access to the
>  >     service.
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >         As to the actual question above:
> If the
>  >     service
>  >       >         continues to
>  >       >           >       >         work fine
>  >       >           >       >         with only the commonly released
>  >     minimal set
>  >       >         of data
>  >       >           >       >         (common-lib-terms
>  >       >           >       >         or eduPersonScopedAffiliation for
>  >       >         authorisation; SAML
>  >       >           >     persistent
>  >       >           >       >         NameID or eduPersonTargetedID or
> SAML
>  >       >         pairwise-id for
>  >       >           >       >         personalisation
>  >       >           >       >         functionality) I see no reason to
> change
>  >       >         anything in
>  >       >           >     order to
>  >       >           >       >         encourge
>  >       >           >       >         institutions to send *more* personal
>  >     data to
>  >       >         the
>  >       >         publisher.
>  >       >           >       >         (And even if we did, what makes LN
> so
>  >       >         special here?
>  >       >           >     Wouldn't
>  >       >           >     we also
>  >       >           >       >         have to have this discussion then
>  >     for every
>  >       >         other of the
>  >       >           >     hundreds of
>  >       >           >       >         SPs we have for "institutionally
>  >     licensed
>  >       >         e-resource
>  >       >           >     access"?)
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >         Best regards,
>  >       >           >       >         -peter
>  >       >           >       >
>  >     _______________________________________________
>  >       >           >       >         FIM4L mailing list
>  >       >           >       > FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de> <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>>
>  >       >         <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de> <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>>>
>  >       >           >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>
>  >       >         <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>> <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>
>  >       >         <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>>>>
>  >       >           >       > http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >       >
> _______________________________________________
>  >       >           >       > FIM4L mailing list
>  >       >           >       > FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de> <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>>
>  >       >         <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de> <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>>>
>  >       >           >       > http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l
>  >       >           >       >
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >     --
>  >       >           >     Bernd Oberknapp
>  >       >           >     Gesamtleitung ReDI
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >     Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
>  >       >           >     Universitätsbibliothek
>  >       >           >     Platz der Universität 2 | Postfach 1629
>  >       >           >     D-79098 Freiburg        | D-79016 Freiburg
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >     Telefon:  +49 761 203-3852
>  >       >           >     Telefax:  +49 761 203-3987
>  >       >           >     E-Mail: bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  >     <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >       >         <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  >     <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>> <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  >     <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >       >         <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  >     <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>>>
>  >       >           >     Internet: www.ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  >     <http://www.ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >       >         <http://www.ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >     <http://www.ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >       >           >
>  >       >           >     _______________________________________________
>  >       >           >     FIM4L mailing list
>  >       >           > FIM4L at lists.daasi.de <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>>
>  >       >         <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de> <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de
>  >     <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>>>
>  >       >           > http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l
>  >       >           >
>  >       >
>  >       >
>  >       >         --
>  >       >         Bernd Oberknapp
>  >       >         Gesamtleitung ReDI
>  >       >
>  >       >         Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
>  >       >         Universitätsbibliothek
>  >       >         Platz der Universität 2 | Postfach 1629
>  >       >         D-79098 Freiburg        | D-79016 Freiburg
>  >       >
>  >       >         Telefon:  +49 761 203-3852
>  >       >         Telefax:  +49 761 203-3987
>  >       >         E-Mail: bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  >     <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de> <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  >     <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>>
>  >       >         Internet: www.ub.uni-freiburg.de
>  >     <http://www.ub.uni-freiburg.de> <http://www.ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >       >
>  >       >
>  >       > _______________________________________________
>  >       > FIM4L mailing list
>  >       > FIM4L at lists.daasi.de <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>
>  >       > http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l
>  >       >
>  >
>  >
>  >     --
>  >     Bernd Oberknapp
>  >     Gesamtleitung ReDI
>  >
>  >     Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
>  >     Universitätsbibliothek
>  >     Platz der Universität 2 | Postfach 1629
>  >     D-79098 Freiburg        | D-79016 Freiburg
>  >
>  >     Telefon:  +49 761 203-3852
>  >     Telefax:  +49 761 203-3987
>  >     E-Mail: bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de <mailto:bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >     Internet: www.ub.uni-freiburg.de <http://www.ub.uni-freiburg.de>
>  >
>  >     _______________________________________________
>  >     FIM4L mailing list
>  >     FIM4L at lists.daasi.de <mailto:FIM4L at lists.daasi.de>
>  >     http://lists.daasi.de/listinfo/fim4l
>  >
>
>
> --
> Bernd Oberknapp
> Gesamtleitung ReDI
>
> Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
> Universitätsbibliothek
> Platz der Universität 2 | Postfach 1629
> D-79098 Freiburg        | D-79016 Freiburg
>
> Telefon:  +49 761 203-3852
> Telefax:  +49 761 203-3987
> E-Mail:   bo at ub.uni-freiburg.de
> Internet: www.ub.uni-freiburg.de
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.daasi.de/pipermail/fim4l/attachments/20210313/288b5573/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the FIM4L mailing list